Powered By
Read more on this at this link:
A third of US health department websites don’t mention U=U
https://www.aidsmap.com/news/nov-2023/third-us-...
Answer Summary
Members debated whether the U.S. and other governments should do more to promote U=U, with many feeling that stigma around HIV as a 'gay or... Read more
Personally as someone who took the decision to spilt from my wife who was so safe because she never wanted ANY intimacy, the woman I met and fell in love with, was someone that took me a lot longer to disclose my status to.
The fact that U=U had been announced made the disclosure a little easier to be honest, and have now been married 2 years.
The British government would be wise to launch another media message as they did when ‘AIDS’ first hit the headlines where a series of adverts were rolled out telling the public not to die of ignorance
I don't think any government is bold enough to address u=u this early because undetectable can still be detectable. It is has not been eradicated completely. Then as human being we can sometimes be strongheads and become unruly with sex. I think we can be celebrated quietly to encourag others on adherence.
Darinlist3 I’m ok I’m still in the anger phase of this disease. It’s just like AA or the beravement process I gotta go through the stages thanks for looking after me
@A myHIVteam Member it's not that I doubt the research. I don't doubt that I'm undetectable and can't transmit. I doubt believing someone that I've never seen take a pill or get a shot. That's the flaw in u=u. It's for intimate partners not so much for down the block Joe.
Absolutely but as I said in a previous comment this is still considered a gay and drug user disease and since the majority of people in the USA are straight it’s not gonna happen. Putting a biktarvy commercial or divoto commercial on CNN is as close as we are gonna get
Join
Your Privacy Choices
